יש לקרוא את הטקסט ולענות באנגלית על השאלות בחלקים A ו-B (60 נקודות). אחר כך כותבים את החיבור בחלק C (40 נקודות). אפשר לענות במילים שלך, אלא אם השאלה מבקשת להעתיק מהטקסט.
Read the text and answer the questions in Parts A and B in English (60 points). Then write the composition in Part C (40 points). Answer in your own words if the question does not ask for words from the text.
Why that is the wrong answer to the privacy question
Whenever the subject of digital privacy comes up, someone always says
the same thing: "I don't care who collects my data. I have nothing to hide."
I used to say it myself. It sounds reasonable, even brave. But the more I
have learned about how our information is used, the more I have come to
believe that this argument misunderstands the problem completely.
Let us start with what is actually collected. Every time we search for
something, “like” a post, use a map or buy something online, we leave a trace.
Individually, these traces seem meaningless. Who cares that I looked up the
opening hours of a pharmacy on a Tuesday night? Combined, however, thousands
of such details can reveal a surprisingly accurate picture of a person:
where they live and work, what they worry about, how much they earn, even
whether they are unwell. Many of us share this information without ever
reading the terms and conditions, which are often longer than a short novel.
Defenders of this system argue that it is a fair exchange. We receive
free services, such as email, social networks and navigation apps, and in
return companies use our data to show us advertisements. There is some truth
in this, and nobody is forcing us to use these services. Yet the exchange is
hardly equal. Most users have no idea what is being collected, how long it
is kept or to whom it is sold. A deal in which one side does not know the
price is not much of a deal.
The "nothing to hide" argument also assumes that privacy matters only to
people who have done something wrong. This is simply false. We close the
bathroom door not because we are committing a crime but because some parts
of life belong to us alone. A teenager exploring who they are, a person
dealing with an illness, an employee looking for a new job without telling
their boss: none of them is hiding anything shameful, and all of them have
good reasons to keep certain information private.
Moreover, data does not stay where we leave it. Companies are bought and
sold, security systems are hacked, and information collected for one purpose
may later be used for another. A photo shared innocently at fifteen may be
found by a university or an employer years later. Once information is out,
it is almost impossible to take back.
None of this means we should throw away our phones. The technology
brings enormous benefits, and I have no wish to return to paper maps. But we
should stop treating privacy as an old-fashioned luxury. As individuals, we
can check our settings, think before we post and question apps that ask for
more access than they need. As citizens, we can demand clear laws that put
us, not the companies, in control.
Privacy is not about having something to hide. It is about having the
right to decide what we show.
תרגילים
Part A — Understanding the text
תרגיל 1
What is the writer's attitude to the argument "I have nothing to hide"? Choose the correct answer. (lines 1–5)
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: ב The writer used to agree with it, but now she thinks it misunderstands the problem.
תרגיל 2
Answer the questions. (lines 6–12)
Why do single "traces" seem unimportant, while thousands of them are not?
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|One detail alone means nothing, but many details combined give an accurate picture of a person.}}
תרגיל 3
Answer the questions. (lines 6–12)
Give TWO things that combined data can reveal about a person.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|Any two: where they live and work, what they worry about, how much they earn, whether they are unwell.}}
תרגיל 4
Why does the writer mention that the terms and conditions are "often longer than a short novel"? (lines 12–13)
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|To show that they are so long that most people do not read them, so they agree to share their information without knowing it.}}
תרגיל 5
Complete the table about the "fair exchange" argument. (lines 14–20)
What users get — ___
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|free services such as email, social networks and navigation apps}}
תרגיל 6
Complete the table about the "fair exchange" argument. (lines 14–20)
What companies get — ___
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|our data, which they use to show us advertisements}}
תרגיל 7
Complete the table about the "fair exchange" argument. (lines 14–20)
Why the writer says the exchange is not equal — ___
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|most users have no idea what is collected, how long it is kept or to whom it is sold}}
תרגיל 8
Explain the sentence: "A deal in which one side does not know the price is not much of a deal." (lines 19–20)
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|In a fair deal both sides know what they give; users do not know what they "pay" with their data, so the exchange is not really fair.}}
תרגיל 9
The writer's examples of people who need privacy have done something shameful.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: לא נכון · “none of them is hiding anything shameful”
תרגיל 10
Information always stays with the company that collected it.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: לא נכון · “data does not stay where we leave it”
תרגיל 11
A photo shared by a teenager may cause problems years later.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: נכון · “A photo shared innocently at fifteen may be found by a university or an employer years later”
Part B — The writer's purpose and tone
תרגיל 12
Why does the writer give the example of the bathroom door? Choose the correct answer. (lines 22–24)
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: ג To show that wanting privacy does not mean that we have done something wrong.
תרגיל 13
Which best describes the tone of the article? Choose the correct answer.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: ד persuasive but balanced
תרגיל 14
Answer the questions. (lines 33–38)
Give ONE thing the writer says we can do as individuals and ONE thing we can do as citizens.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|Individuals: check our settings / think before we post / question apps that ask for too much access. Citizens: demand clear laws that put people, not companies, in control.}}
תרגיל 15
Answer the questions. (lines 33–38)
Which of these do you think is more effective? Explain.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|Personal answer: clear choice + logical reason + clear English.}}
Part C — Writing
תרגיל 16
Some parents check their teenagers' phones and social media accounts. Write an opinion essay: should parents be allowed to do this? Give reasons and examples, and refer to the other side of the argument. Write 120–140 words.
להציג את התשובה והפתרון
התשובה: {{en|A good answer: a clear position; two or three developed arguments (for example safety, protecting young people from strangers or bullying / privacy, trust, the right to decide what we show); a reply to the other side; a conclusion. May use ideas from the text. Rubric: content 16, organisation 10 (paragraphs, linking words), language 14 (B2 range and accuracy).}}